![]() ![]()
It can help you make solid objects in such a way that it replicates the properties of materials like clay and metal. Tools allow users to create and interact with digital 3D objects and perform actions such as pull, move, combine, and fill. ![]() It might be a good product, but the learning curve is way beyond what I'm willing to expend at this point.DesignSpark Mechanical Review and OverviewĭesignSpark Mechanical supports rapid prototyping through a 3D modeling system. #Designspark mechanical vs freecad license#The license for use of the free version has gotten pretty restrictive under Trimble as well. Trimble seems to be spending a lot of effort adding online features and other pretty parts to SketchUp without fixing what I think is a broken modeler. ![]() That's why there are so many tools out there to "repair" stl files created in SU. This makes conversion to a solid based paradigm extremely problematic. ![]() Upon close examination of the "models" (sets of faces actually) in SU, a lot of the faces don't connect (are open). I've used SU for years for simple woodworking design work. SU can make some very pretty crappy models that will drive a slicer nuts. I strongly recommend that SketchUp not be used for modeling for printing purposes. The import/export capabilities are very good and I use OnShape for doing conversions that other modelers can't handle. #Designspark mechanical vs freecad pro#More is available if you make your models public, or pony up the $100/month for the pro version. This might be enough for you, it's not for me. You are allowed 10 models and 100 mb of storage for private models IIRC. #Designspark mechanical vs freecad for free#OnShape is a good modeler within the confines of it's rather restrictive license for free accounts. It does only parts (no assemblies) and it's a bit rudimentary at this point. I cannot recommend it.Ī lot of folks are recommending FreeCAD. I'm not crazy for the concept, but at this juncture I consider this to be an acceptable compromise.ĭesign Spark Mechanical seems to have the features to make a good modeler, but is extremely limited in import/export capabilities. The downside is your models are not stored locally. It's a robust product, is well supported and it's free to enthusiasts. I've used SolidWorks for over 20 years and have recently gone through a review of the newer modelers: #Designspark mechanical vs freecad software#This may take several days, but you will win these back very quickly if you find the right software for you. If you can live with an online package, it is quite powerful.īefore deciding, first have a look at several demo-videos and webinars of each potential package, and see what appeals to your way of thinking and working. But it should run locally, and save files locally, I think. From a technical viewpoint, it is absolutely wonderful that they get it done at all via a browser and the net. I also tried Onshape, but it was quite slow over the network here. Have a look at their demo videos and webinars.įreeCad is also useful if you know exactly what you want, without need to change it afterwards, because it is not flexible, and later updates usually break the model. I once tried an old demo a couple of years ago (was 1 month free), and they had quite good support back then. You might also have a look into Form-Z from Autodessys: not free, but they have quite a lot of functions for organic shapes. Easy to learn, lots of good training videos, and you can also use SpaceClaim videos, since DSM is a limited subset of this.įor complex organic shapes, I think Blender (also freeware) might be a good choice, but it has a *huge* learning curve. For relatively simple technical parts based on geometric shapes, and where you often need to adjust dimensions, DesignSpark Mechanical (freeware) might be a good choice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |